Most radiation oncologists in German-speaking countries believe heart-sparing techniques are supported by evidence for breast cancer patients, but widespread implementation is hindered by time and resource constraints.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Identifies resource constraints as the primary barrier to cardio-protective radiotherapy in breast cancer; leaves open how.
BACKGROUND: To assess the personal beliefs of radiation oncologists regarding heart sparing techniques in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Between August 2015 and September 2015, a survey was sent to radiation oncology departments in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. 82 radiation oncology departments answered the questionnaire: 16 university clinics and 66 other departments. Most (87.2%) of the participants had >10 years of radiation oncology experience. RESULTS: 89.2% of the participants felt that there is enough evidence to support heart sparing for breast cancer patients. The most important dose parameter was considered the mean heart dose (69.1%). The personal "safe" dose to the heart was considered to be 5 Gy (range: 0-40 Gy). The main impediment in offering all breast cancer patients heart-sparing techniques seems to be the fact that these techniques are time/ resource consuming (46.5% of the participants). CONCLUSIONS: Most radiation oncologists believe that there is enough evidence to support heart sparing for breast cancer patients. But translating this belief into a wide practice will need better dosimetric and clinical data on what patients are expected to profit most, specific guidelines for which patients' heart sparing techniques should be performed, as well as recognition of the time/resource consumption of these techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duma et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: