Why the study?
Multiple studies on the DX ICD system had been conducted over more than a decade, prompting a need to summarise the data.
Does the VR-DX ICD system provide reliable atrial sensing and acceptable clinical outcomes in patients requiring an ICD?
Does the VR-DX ICD system provide reliable atrial sensing and acceptable clinical outcomes in patients requiring an ICD?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The VR-DX ICD system provides reliable atrial sensing without requiring a second lead, while maintaining expected shock and mortality rates.
Background: A DX implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) system consists of an ICD and a shock lead equipped with two ring electrodes positioned in the atrium, referred to as the DX-lead. This system allows the collection of atrial signals using a single lead. Multiple studies on the device have been conducted over more than a decade. Aims: The aim of this study is to summarise these data in a non-comparative meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic literature review targeting publications on studies including a certain type of ICD, VR-DX ICD, was conducted. Subsequently a meta-analysis of proportions was conducted. Endpoints selected for evaluation included p-wave amplitude (at day 0, <6 months, 6-12 months and >12 months), appropriate and inappropriate shock rates, and all-cause mortality. Results: One randomised controlled trial, 11 prospective cohort studies and registries, and two retrospective studies were selected for analysis. P-wave amplitudes were consistently in a range where they can support clinical decision making across studies and remained stable over a follow-up of up to two years. Pooled shock incidence was consistent with industry standard for appropriate (10.7%) and inappropriate shocks (2.4%) across studies. All-cause mortality was at an average of 5%, increasing, as expected, with duration of study follow-up. Like shock results, mortality was within the expected range. Conclusion: This analysis shows that the VR-DX ICD system works reliably and provides an added benefit compared to single chamber ICD in the form of atrial sensing. Atrial view without requiring a second lead provides clinicians with an attractive, hardware-sparing option for the continuous monitoring of atrial activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freitag et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: