Key result
The Linox(smart) S DX ICD lead with a floating atrial sensing dipole achieved appropriate atrial sensing in 93.8% of tests (P=0.005) and 94.8% freedom from lead-related reinterventions (P=0.048).
Why the study?
Does a single-lead ICD with a floating atrial sensing dipole provide appropriate atrial sensing in patients requiring an ICD?
Does a single-lead ICD with a floating atrial sensing dipole provide appropriate atrial sensing in patients requiring an ICD?
A single-lead ICD with a floating atrial sensing dipole demonstrated high rates of appropriate atrial sensing and freedom from lead-related reinterventions at 6 months.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports short-term atrial sensing with DX leads; leaves open randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: The concept of a single-lead implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), with a floating dipole, has been proven safe and functional. METHODS AND RESULTS: The studied active-fixation, steroid-eluting lead (Linox(smart) S DX, BIOTRONIK SE & Co KG, Berlin, Germany) is one French thinner than its predecessor and coated with lubricious SilGlide to improve lead handling. A dedicated ICD device has a self-adaptive atrial input stage including a fourfold amplifier. The amplification, filtering, and adapted atrial input stage are located in the Lumax 540 VR-T DX (BIOTRONIK). The Linox(smart) S DX ICD lead delivers only the signal. The lead was evaluated during implantation; at predischarge; and 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up examinations. The primary endpoint (efficacy) was the rate of appropriate atrial sensing tests. The secondary endpoint (safety) was freedom from lead-related invasive reinterventions. Both safety and efficacy were expected to be significantly higher than 90%. The study enrolled 116 patients at 25 clinical sites. Skin-to-skin operation time was 52.4 ± 26.2 minutes. The investigators graded lead insertion as "easy" in 87% of patients. Mean P-wave amplitudes (preamplified) varied from 5.0 to 6.1 mV in different body positions. Both primary and secondary endpoints were met, as 93.8% (364/388; P = 0.005) of specific sensing tests indicated appropriate atrial sensing, and 94.8% (110/116; P = 0.048) of patients were free from reinterventions (lead dislodgement). Analysis of arrhythmia episodes stored in ICDs and elective 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram tests raised no concerns about lead functionality. CONCLUSION: The studied ICD lead with a floating atrial sensing dipole met the predefined safety expectation and demonstrated appropriate atrial sensing performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Şafak et al. (2013) studied this question. Linox(smart) S DX ICD lead was evaluated on rate of appropriate atrial sensing tests (p=0.005). The Linox(smart) S DX ICD lead with a floating atrial sensing dipole achieved appropriate atrial sensing in 93.8% of tests (P=0.005) and 94.8% freedom from lead-related reinterventions (P=0.048).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: