Why the study?
The study aimed to develop mesocycle training plans for high school boys engaged in speed skiing using cardio-functional indicators obtained via bicycle ergometer testing.
Does cardio-differentiated planning based on EGM testing improve sports results and cardiac capacity in young male speed skiers?
Does cardio-differentiated planning based on EGM testing improve sports results and cardiac capacity in young male speed skiers?
Cardio-differentiated planning using bicycle ergometer testing may help tailor aerobic loads and improve performance in young speed skiers.
Individualized EGM cardiac-capacity mesocycles should not yet change junior skier training; leaves open efficacy beyond this n=8 cohort.
In speed skiing, an athlete’s functional readiness is tested by means of a bicycle ergometer (EGM). The purpose of this research is to make various mesocycle plans for high school boys, engaged in speed skiing, with due account for their cardio-functional indicators obtained by means of the EGM. The study was attended by the 16–17 years old, first-category and sub-master racing skiers, included in the junior regional teams of the Russian Federation (Republic of Tatarstan and Udmurtia). The total number of subjects included eight men. In training young racing skiers, a differentiated approach combined with leg muscle testing will allow an improvement in sports results more effectively at different stages, as well as monitoring the young athlete’s response to the cardiovascular load. Low cardiac capacity indices have a negative impact on the racing skier’s performance. EGM testing allows determining the maximum cardiac capacity by measuring the amount of oxygen delivered to the working muscles at the HR of 190 beats per minute. Therefore, case-specific aerobic load was planned for each mesocycle according to these data. Based on the cardiac capacity growth, such means of physical training as interval, high-speed, and tempo training were planned.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roman Evgenyevich Petrov (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: