Why the study?
Patients face variable legal driving restrictions after ICD implantation or replacement, but the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia during these restriction periods required assessment.
What is the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during the theoretical driving restriction period after ICD implantation or replacement?
What is the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during the theoretical driving restriction period after ICD implantation or replacement?
The low risk of ventricular arrhythmias after primary prevention ICD implantation or device replacement suggests current driving restriction periods could be reduced, while the higher risk after secondary prevention supports the 3-month restriction.
Should not yet shorten driving restrictions after primary-prevention ICD or replacement; leaves current secondary-prevention guidelines unchallenged pending prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Following implantation/replacement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, patients are legally subjected to variable lengths of driving restrictions based on the indication (1 and 3 months after primary and secondary prevention, respectively; 1 week after device replacement). AIM: To assess the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia during the theoretical driving restriction period in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation for primary or secondary prevention or device replacement between 2015 and 2021 were included retrospectively. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia during the theoretical driving restriction period, as defined by guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 914 patients were analysed, including 654 first implantations (438 and 216 for primary and secondary prevention, respectively) and 260 device replacements. The primary outcome occurred in 2/438 patients (0.004%) during the 1-month period following device implantation for primary prevention and in 25/216 patients (11.5%) during the 3-month period following device implantation for secondary prevention; it did not occur in the 1-week period following device replacement. The monthly calculated risk of harm remained below the accepted threshold of 0.005% for each group. CONCLUSIONS: Primary prevention patients, such as those who have undergone device replacement, have a low risk of ventricular arrhythmia, which could lead to a reduction in their driving restriction period. Secondary prevention patients experienced a higher risk of recurrent ventricular arrhythmia, supporting the 3-month driving restriction period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bénali et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: