Why the study?
Does the PAI-1 I/D gene polymorphism affect the age-related increase in pulse pressure in subjects with never treated essential hypertension?
Does the PAI-1 I/D gene polymorphism affect the age-related increase in pulse pressure in subjects with never treated essential hypertension?
The PAI-1 I/D gene polymorphism (D/D genotype) is associated with an accelerated age-related increase in pulse pressure in patients with untreated essential hypertension, highlighting a genetic modulation of mechanical arterial factors.
D/D PAI-1 genotype was associated with steeper age-related pulse pressure rise in untreated hypertension; hypothesis-generating, does not support genotyping for risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: Pulse pressure (PP), a marker of cyclic strain on the arterial wall, is a significant predictor of cardiovascular (CV) risk, particularly regarding the incidence of coronary arterial stenosis. Genes related to haemostatic and/or fibrinolytic factors are consistently influenced in vitro by mechanical strain. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to determine, in the three genotypes of the plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 gene polymorphism, the gender-adjusted difference in the relationships between age and PP in subjects with never treated essential hypertension. RESULTS: In the studied population, the genotype deletion (D)/D at position -675 of the PAI-1 insertion (I)/D gene polymorphism was associated with a significant increase in the adjusted slope of the curve relating age to PP by comparison with the two other genotypes. No comparable difference in age-related changes in systolic, diastolic or mean blood pressure was found. CONCLUSION: In subjects with essential hypertension, the PAI-1 I/D gene polymorphism modulates the age-mediated increase of PP, suggesting new insights on the complex interactions between genes, mechanical factors and CV risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mourad et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: