Why the study?
Uncontrolled hypertension rates remain high across China, prompting the need for an index quantifying socio-behavioral aspects to screen high-risk patients in primary care.
Nearly half of treated hypertensive patients in a Chinese community had uncontrolled blood pressure, which can be predicted using a 7-factor socio-behavioral risk model.
May help screen high-risk patients in Chinese primary care; leaves open prospective validation before any practice change.
BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled hypertension rate was still high across China. This study develops and validates an index to help quantify the combination of socio-behavioral aspects to screen high-risk patients in uncontrolled hypertension in Chinese primary care. METHODS: A cross-sectional study included 1,039 of patients with hypertension in the Chinese community. We assessed independent risk factors of uncontrolled blood pressure (defined as having a blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg, even with antihypertensive therapy) and develop a risk prediction model. RESULTS: Among the 1,039 patients (53.9% male, the average age was 61 ± 13 years), 452 (43.5%) were uncontrolled hypertensive. Multivariable analysis showed that worker (odds ratio, OR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.46-2.69), no health insurance (OR: 3.47, 95% CI: 2.08-5.80), non-marital status (OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.35-3.27), and other socio-behavioral aspects were independent risk factors of uncontrolled hypertension, which were included the final prediction model (C-static: 0.781). With internal validation by the bootstrap method, the risk score showed good discriminating ability and predicting ability for the incidence of uncontrolled hypertension (C-static: 0.771). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that nearly half of the patients suffered from uncontrolled hypertension in the Chinese community. We established a prediction model with good predictability to help quantify the combination of socio-behavioral aspects and screen high-risk patients with uncontrolled hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: