Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review demonstrates machine learning integration with label-free optical biosensing for live-cell analysis, indicating improved cellular dynamics profiling and biomechanical estimation.
Label-free optical biosensing combined with machine learning enables live-cell analysis with high spatial and temporal resolution and can improve cell-state classification, response profiling, and estimation of biomechanically relevant variables. This review organizes works into single-modal and multimodal workflows. In single-modal analysis, representation-oriented approaches improve signal quality and provide data reconstruction or calibration before modeling, whereas inference-oriented approaches map optical data to phenotypes, adhesion behavior, or other biologically relevant variables. These roles are examined across surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), surface plasmon resonance/resonant waveguide grating (SPR/RWG), and digital holographic microscopy (DHM). Multimodal workflows are grouped into reference-based calibration, in which an auxiliary modality supervises a primary platform, and joint multimodal inference, in which complementary readouts are fused to estimate cell state robustly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Béres et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: