Why the study?
Under-expanded coronary stents from inadequate preparation of calcified lesions worsen clinical outcomes, and further evidence is needed regarding the off-label use of S-IVL for this issue.
Does Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy effectively and safely correct under-expanded coronary stents?
Does Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy effectively and safely correct under-expanded coronary stents?
Off-label use of Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy appears effective and safe for treating under-expanded coronary stents due to calcified lesions.
Should not yet change practice; leaves open the role of off-label S-IVL versus other techniques for underexpanded stents.
Under-expanded coronary stent related to inadequate preparation of calcified lesion is associated with poor clinical outcomes.Off-label use of S-IVL to correct this clinical issue is effective and safe, probably more than other current techniques. However, this statement needs further evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fedele et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: