Key result
Epicardial adipose tissue volume assessed by CMR was significantly higher in HFpEF patients compared to controls and pre-HF patients, irrespective of diabetes and BMI.
Why the study?
Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) contributes to HFpEF pathophysiology, but its relationship with metabolic factors and imaging characteristics across HF stages required exploration.
Does elevated epicardial adipose tissue predict mortality or heart failure hospitalization in patients with HFpEF?
Cohort (n=337)
Yes
Does elevated epicardial adipose tissue predict mortality or heart failure hospitalization in patients with HFpEF?
Absolute Event Rate: 72.4% vs 48%
p-value: p=<0.001
Epicardial adipose tissue is significantly elevated in HFpEF patients compared to pre-HF and controls, but does not independently predict mortality or heart failure hospitalization.
Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasingly prevalent worldwide due to aging and comorbidities. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), favored by diabetes and obesity, was shown to contribute to HFpEF pathophysiology and is an emerging therapeutic target. This study explored the relationship between ventricular EAT measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), metabolic factors, and imaging characteristics in controls, pre-HF patients, and HFpEF patients. Patients from a Belgian cohort enrolled from December 2015 to June 2017 were categorized by HF stage: pre-HF (n = 16), HFpEF (n = 104) and compared to matched controls (n = 26) and to pre-HF (n = 191) from the Beta3-LVH cohort. Biventricular EAT volume was measured in end-diastolic short-axis cine stacks. In the Belgian cohort, associations between EAT, HF stage, and various biological and imaging markers were explored. The clinical endpoint was a composite of mortality or first HF hospitalization in the HFpEF group. EAT significantly differed between groups, with higher values in HFpEF patients compared to pre-HF and controls (72.4 ± 20.8ml/m2vs. 55.0 ± 11.8ml/m2 and 48 ± 8.9ml/m2, p < 0.001) from the Belgian cohort and to pre-HF (52.0 ± 15.0 ml/m2, p < 0.001) from the Beta3-LVH cohort. Subsequent analyses focused on the Belgian cohort. In contrast to atrial fibrillation, diabetes prevalence and body mass index (BMI) did not differ between pre-HF and HFpEF patients. Multivariable logistic regression and random forest classification identified EAT, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and H2FPEF score as strong markers of HFpEF status. EAT was significantly correlated with H2FPEF score (r = 0.41, p = 0.003), BMI (r = 0.30, p < 0.001), high‐sensitive troponin T (r = 0.41, p < 0.001), NT-proBNP (r = 0.37, p < 0.001), soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) (r = 0.30, p < 0.001), E/e’ ratio (r = 0.33, p < 0.001), and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (r = 0.35, p < 0.001). In HFpEF patients, diabetes, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and elevated sST2 were independently associated with elevated EAT. In contrast with diabetes and BMI, increased EAT was not associated with prognosis. EAT assessed by CMR was significantly higher in HFpEF patients compared to controls and pre-HF patients, irrespective of diabetes and BMI. EAT was moderately associated with HFpEF status. HFpEF patients with elevated EAT exhibited a marked diabetic, ischemic, and inflammatory profile, highlighting the potential role of drugs targeting EAT. Characterization of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction; Assessment of Efficacy of Mirabegron, a New beta3-adrenergic Receptor in the Prevention of Heart Failure (Beta3_LVH). ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT03197350; NCT02599480.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menghoum et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=337). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) vs. Pre-HF patients and healthy controls was evaluated on Indexed biventricular epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume (ml/m2) (p=<0.001). Epicardial adipose tissue volume assessed by CMR was significantly higher in HFpEF patients compared to controls and pre-HF patients, irrespective of diabetes and BMI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: