Why the study?
Does the evolution of acute myocardial infarction treatments over time reduce hospital mortality in patients admitted within 24 hours of onset?
Does the evolution of acute myocardial infarction treatments over time reduce hospital mortality in patients admitted within 24 hours of onset?
Advances in AMI treatment, particularly reperfusion and stenting, have significantly reduced cardiac mortality, but non-cardiac mortality remains unchanged, highlighting the need for improved general care.
Declining cardiac mortality in AMI was associated with treatment advances; extends prior cohorts but leaves open strategies to address unchanged non-cardiac deaths.
BACKGROUND: Many patients with acute myocardial infarction will still die after admission. Recent trends in hospital mortality were analyzed to identify aspects that need improvement. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1,247 patients admitted to Kinki University School of Medicine within 24 h of the onset of infarction were analyzed between 1975 and 2001. The percentage of patients discharged with 100% occlusion decreased gradually from 31.3% during 1975-1982 to 2.1% during 1998-2001, while those with 50% stenosis or less gradually increased from 12.5% to 82.5% during the same period (trends: p < 0.01). The cardiac death rate was 17.1% in 1975-1982, and 7.7% in 1998-2001, showing a significant decrease with time (p < 0.01). This decrease was particularly marked among those admitted within 6 h of the onset of infarction. Death due to cardiac rupture decreased significantly with time (p < 0.001). In contrast, the non-cardiac death rate, amounting to 2.2% on average, did not decline. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac deaths due to acute myocardial infarction have decreased markedly of late. However, patients must be admitted within 6 h of the onset of infarction to benefit from this improvement. More effort should be made to improve the general care of patients in order to reduce the incidence of non-cardiac death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayashi et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: