Hypertension and platelet hypersensitivity to ADP are independently associated with aspirin non-response in stroke patients, suggesting a potential need for tailored antiplatelet therapy.
May flag aspirin non-response risk in hypertensive stroke patients; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Despite its widespread use, there are many concerns about the efficacy of aspirin in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events after stroke, leading to the concept of aspirin non-response (ANR). Although the mechanisms of ANR remain uncertain, it is expected to be due to a combination of clinical, biological and genetic characteristics affecting platelet function. In this study, we investigated whether clinical and/or biological factors such as hypertension and platelet response to ADP could contribute to the ANR. As a secondary objective, we determine whether ANR and collagen/ADP closure time (CADP-CT) could be related to platelet glycoprotein single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). One hundred patients on aspirin (160 mg/day) were enrolled. ANR was measured with a platelet function analyzer (PFA-100); genotyping of four SNPs (GP IIIa, GP Ia, P2Y12 and GP VI) was performed using a tetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system. Using a collagen/epinephrine-coated cartridge on the PFA-100, the prevalence of ANR was 15% (n = 15). In the ANR group, (i) CADP-CT was significantly shorter and (ii) hypertension was an independent clinical predictive factor of ANR (OR = 4.25; 95%CI: 1.06-17.11). No clear relation was found between CADT-CT and platelet gene polymorphism as well as ANR status and SNPs. In conclusion our study confirms the independent relationship between hypertension, platelet hypersensitivity to ADP and aspirin (160 mg/day) non-response. The differential sensitivity to aspirin may have potential clinical implications, where adaptation of antiplatelet therapy is necessary according to a patient's clinical and genetic characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Godenèche et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: