Key result
Submaximal OUES differs by ~2% from maximal testing, reliably measuring cardiopulmonary functional reserve.
Why the study?
Is the Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope (OUES) a reliable and valid index of cardiopulmonary reserve that can be derived from submaximal exercise in adults?
Observational (n=1,010)
Is the Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope (OUES) a reliable and valid index of cardiopulmonary reserve that can be derived from submaximal exercise in adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope (OUES) is an objective, reproducible measure of cardiopulmonary reserve that does not require a maximal exercise effort, making it a practical alternative to VO2max.
OBJECTIVES We sought to evaluate, in adults, the efficacy of the Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope (OUES), an index of cardiopulmonary functional reserve that can be based upon a submaximal exercise effort. BACKGROUND Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2,max), the most reliable measure of exercise capacity, is seldom attained in standard exercise testing. The OUES, which relates oxygen uptake to total ventilation during exercise, was proposed by Baba and coworkers (7) in a study of pediatric cardiac patients. They felt this submaximal index of cardiopulmonary reserve might be more practical than VO2max and more appropriate than the commonly used peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak). METHODS Treadmill exercise tests with simultaneous respiratory gas measurement were performed in 998 older subjects free of clinically recognized cardiovascular disease and 12 male patients with congestive heart failure. During incremental exercise, oxygen uptake was plotted against the logarithm of total ventilation, and the OUES was determined. RESULTS The OUES, when calculated only from the first 75% of the exercise test, differed by 1.9% from the OUES calculated from 100% of exercise time in subjects with a peak respiratory exchange rate > or =1.10. On serial tests the OUES was less variable than exercise duration or VO2 peak. It correlated strongly with VO2max, with forced expiratory volume in 1 s and negatively with a history of current smoking. The OUES declined linearly with age in both women and men. A small sample of patients with congestive heart failure had OUES values much lower than those of older subjects without cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS The OUES is an objective, reproducible measure of cardiopulmonary reserve that does not require a maximal exercise effort. It integrates cardiovascular, musculoskeletal and respiratory function into a single index that is largely influenced by pulmonary dead space ventilation and exercise-induced lactic acidosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hollenberg et al. (2000) conducted an observational in Healthy older adults and congestive heart failure (n=1,010). Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope (OUES) was evaluated on Difference in OUES calculated from the first 75% versus 100% of exercise time. The Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope (OUES) calculated from submaximal exercise differed by only 1.9% from maximal exercise, offering a reproducible measure of cardiopulmonary reserve.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: