Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Direct air capture (DAC) is a promising carbon dioxide removal technology, but its effectiveness hinges on access to cheap, low-carbon energy. Here, we present a spatial techno-economic and environmental assessment of the coupling of solid sorbent DAC with different energy sources. We found that the most cost- and energy-efficient option is to couple DAC with thermal power plants, e.g., nuclear and natural gas combined cycle with carbon capture. These two options have a gross levelized cost of DAC (LCOD gross ) starting at $246–$503 and $314–$557 per tCO 2 , respectively, for different regions. For renewable energy and energy storage options, regions with good solar irradiation can achieve low LCOD gross , at $319 per tCO 2 when utilizing concentrated solar power, whereas regions with low solar irradiation are unsuitable for this option due to the high cost and large land requirement. Achieving an LCOD gross of ≤$200 per tCO 2 would require significant improvements in the current technology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sendi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: