Why the study?
Does 1-g aspirin alter the time course of recovery of current-induced cutaneous vasodilation compared to placebo?
Does 1-g aspirin alter the time course of recovery of current-induced cutaneous vasodilation compared to placebo?
The prolonged inhibition of current-induced cutaneous vasodilation by aspirin is not due to the time required for neural transport to resupply nerve endings with unblocked cyclooxygenase.
Aspirin may suppress current-induced cutaneous vasodilation for days; leaves open mechanism of prolonged COX inhibition and relevance to clinical vascular testing.
We previously reported that forearm vasodilation to a delivered all-at-once over 5 min or a 1-min repeated monopolar anodal 0.10-mA current application is aspirin sensitive and that a single high-dose aspirin exerts a long-lived effect in the former case. We hypothesized that 1) in the latter case, the effect of aspirin would also be long lived and 2) the time required to resupply nerve endings with unblocked cyclooxygenase through axonal transport could explain this phenomenon. We studied the time course for the recovery of vasodilation to repeated current application after placebo or 1-g aspirin treatment. We then searched for a difference at a proximal vs. distal site in the recovery of the response. Aspirin abolished current-induced vasodilation at 2 h, 10 h, and 3 days, with a progressive recovery thereafter, but no difference between distal and proximal site was observed for the recovery of the response. This suggests that, although neural cyclooxygenase could participate in the response, the time course of aspirin inhibition of current-induced cutaneous vasodilation is not due to the time required through neural transport to resupply nerve endings with unblocked proteins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Durand et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: