Why the study?
Do behavioral factors explain the association between depression, hostility, and cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality in men?
Do behavioral factors explain the association between depression, hostility, and cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality in men?
Behavioral factors such as smoking, diet, and alcohol consumption partially explain the association between depression, hostility, and mortality outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Behavioral factors partially mediate but do not eliminate associations; leaves open independent effects of depression/hostility on mortality.
BACKGROUND: Behavioral factors are important in disease incidence and mortality and may explain associations between mortality and various psychological traits. PURPOSE: These analyses investigated the impact of behavioral factors on the associations between depression, hostility and cardiovascular disease(CVD) incidence, CVD mortality, and all-cause mortality. METHODS: Data from the PRIME Study (N = 6953 men) were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models, following adjustment for demographic and biological CVD risk factors, and other psychological traits, including social support. RESULTS: Following initial adjustment, both depression and hostility were significantly associated with both mortality outcomes (smallest SHR = 1.24, p < 0.001). Following adjustment for behavioral factors, all relationships were attenuated both when accounting for and not accounting for other psychological variables. Associations with all-cause mortality remained significant (smallest SHR = 1.14, p = 0.04). Of the behaviors included, the most significant contribution to outcomes was found for smoking, but a role was also found for fruit and vegetable intakes and high alcohol consumption. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate well-known associations between depression, hostility, and mortality and suggest the potential importance of behaviors in explaining these relationships.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Appleton et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: