Why the study?
Elevated blood pressure is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, but genome-wide association studies have predominantly focused on European ancestry, leaving other ancestries less well-studied.
Do genetically determined blood pressure traits causally increase the risk of specific cardiovascular diseases in Chinese adults?
Do genetically determined blood pressure traits causally increase the risk of specific cardiovascular diseases in Chinese adults?
This large-scale GWAS and Mendelian randomisation study identifies 81 novel genetic associations for blood pressure traits in Chinese adults and confirms their distinct causal roles in different cardiovascular diseases.
Supports BP trait-specific CVD risk assessment in Chinese adults; extends causal genetic evidence to East Asian populations.
Elevated blood pressure (BP) is major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted predominantly in populations of European ancestry have identified >2,000 BP-associated loci, but other ancestries have been less well-studied. We conducted GWAS of systolic, diastolic, pulse, and mean arterial BP in 100,453 Chinese adults. We identified 128 non-overlapping loci associated with one or more BP traits, harbouring 81 novel associations. Despite strong genetic correlations between populations, we identified appreciably higher heritability and larger variant effect sizes in Chinese compared with European or Japanese ancestry populations. Using instruments derived from these GWAS, multivariable Mendelian randomisation demonstrated strong causal associations of specific BP traits with CVD, including systolic BP with intracranial haemorrhage, and pulse pressure with carotid plaque. The findings reinforce the need for studies in diverse populations to understand the genetic determinants of BP traits and their role in disease risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pozarickij et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: