Why the study?
Although DES implantation treats in-stent restenosis effectively, drug-coated balloons may be a valid alternative, especially for recurrent ISR, prompting evaluation of the long-term efficacy of a new DCB.
Does paclitaxel drug-coated balloon treatment prevent Major Adverse Cardiac Events in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis?
Does paclitaxel drug-coated balloon treatment prevent Major Adverse Cardiac Events in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis?
Paclitaxel drug-coated balloons demonstrate high procedural success and favorable long-term freedom from MACE in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis.
Supports paclitaxel DCB for ISR; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm long-term MACE reduction.
AIMS: Drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is an effective treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, literature data indicate that drug-coated balloons (DCBs) may be a valid alternative, particularly for recurrent ISR. We sought to evaluate clinical results on the long-term efficacy of a new DCB for ISR treatment. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-nine patients were treated with paclitaxel drug-coated balloons (Pantera Lux, Biotronik, Switzerland) in the Italian REGistry of Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon in ISR (REGPEB study). Clinical follow-up was scheduled at 1 and 12 months. A subgroup of patients received adjunctive 5-year follow-up. Primary end point was Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 214 ISR coronary lesions were treated (75.4% DES-ISR). Mean time between stent implantation and DCB treatment is 41 months. DCBs were successfully delivered in 99% of the cases; crossover to a DES occurred in 3% of cases. Procedural success rate was 98.5%. Clinical success rate was 98.5%. First-month follow-up compliance was 98% and freedom from MACE was 96.9%. Twelve-month follow-up compliance was 89.3% with a freedom from MACE rate of 87.3% (CI: 81.3-91.5%). Five-year long-term follow-up showed 65.2% of freedom from MACE. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that Pantera Lux treatment is effective and well tolerated in ISR, showing good acute and long/very long-term results in the treatment of complex lesions (DES and late ISR).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galli et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: