Why the study?
Is genetic variability at the TNF locus associated with TNF-alpha plasma levels and the occurrence of graft rejection in heart-transplant patients?
Is genetic variability at the TNF locus associated with TNF-alpha plasma levels and the occurrence of graft rejection in heart-transplant patients?
TNF gene polymorphisms (NcoI, AspHI, promoter changes) do not appear to be associated with heart allograft rejection, though they may influence TNF-alpha plasma levels.
TNF polymorphisms should not inform rejection risk stratification after heart transplant; hypothesis-generating for cytokine level associations.
Plasma TNF-alpha levels are generally higher in heart-graft patients who experience a rejection episode than in those who do not. Because the TNF gene and its promoter are polymorphic, we studied the relationships between genetic variability at the TNF locus, the occurrence of graft rejection and TNF-alpha plasma levels in 62 heart-transplant patients in order to investigate inter-individual differences in plasma TNF-alpha levels after allogeneic stimulation. TNF-alpha was immunoenzymatically measured in blood specimens collected on the same day as endomyocardial biopsy. After PCR amplification of DNA, NcoI and AspHI polymorphisms were characterized by their restriction profiles, TNFa microsatellites by electrophoretic separation on acrylamide and the promoter region by sequencing. Plasma levels and molecular genetic results were compared to the grade of heart graft rejection established according to pathological criteria. In our study, allograft rejection was associated neither with NcoI or AspHI polymorphism nor with nucleotide changes in the TNF-A promote. We observed low TNF-alpha levels in n1/n1 homozygous patients and in subjects with G-->A at position--308 of the promoter sequence. Concerning the polymorphism of the TNFa microsatellite, our results might suggest an association with graft rejection but we have to be very careful in drawing conclusions because of the small size of the sample.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdallah et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: