Key result
Atrial fibrillation was associated with larger tricuspid and mitral annuli compared to sinus rhythm (P<0.05), with greater tricuspid dilation in patients with normal left ventricular function.
Why the study?
Although AF is associated with annular dilation and atrial functional regurgitation, less is known about its impact on both atrioventricular valves across patients with normal and abnormal ventricular function.
Does atrial fibrillation affect three-dimensional mitral and tricuspid annulus geometry in patients referred for transoesophageal echocardiography?
Observational (n=92)
Does atrial fibrillation affect three-dimensional mitral and tricuspid annulus geometry in patients referred for transoesophageal echocardiography?
Atrial fibrillation is associated with significant dilation of both the tricuspid and mitral annuli, with tricuspid dilation being more pronounced than mitral dilation in patients with normal left ventricular function.
AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with atrial enlargement, mitral annulus (MA) and tricuspid annulus (TA) dilation, and atrial functional regurgitation (AFR). However, less is known about the impact of AF on both atrioventricular valves in those with normal and abnormal ventricular function. We aimed to compare the remodelling of the TA and MA in patients with non-valvular AF without significant AFR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-two patients referred for transoesophageal echocardiography were included and categorized into three groups: (i) AF with normal left ventricular (LV) function (Normal LV-AF), n = 36; (ii) AF with LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD-AF), n = 29; and (iii) Controls in sinus rhythm, n = 27. Three-dimensional MA and TA geometry were analysed using automated software. In patients with AF regardless of LV function, the MA and TA areas were larger compared with controls (LVSD-AF vs. Normal LV-AF vs. Controls, end-systolic MA: 5.2 ± 1.1 vs. 4.5 ± 0.7 vs. 3.9 ± 0.7 cm2/m2; end-systolic TA: 5.6 ± 1.3 vs. 5.3 ± 1.3 vs. 4.1 ± 0.7 cm2/m2; P < 0.05 for each comparison with Controls). TA and MA areas were not statistically different between the two AF groups. The TA increase over controls was greater than that of the MA in the Normal LV-AF group (27.7% vs. 15.6%, P = 0.041). Conversely, in the LVSD-AF group, MA and TA increased similarly (35.9% vs. 32.4%, P = 0.660). CONCLUSION: Patients with AF showed dilation of both TA and MA compared with patients in sinus rhythm. In patients with normal LV function, AF was associated with greater TA dilation than MA dilation whereas in patients with LVSD the TA and MA were equally dilated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ortiz‐León et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=92). Atrial fibrillation vs. Sinus rhythm was evaluated on End-systolic mitral and tricuspid annulus areas (p=<0.05). Atrial fibrillation was associated with larger tricuspid and mitral annuli compared to sinus rhythm (P<0.05), with greater tricuspid dilation in patients with normal left ventricular function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: