Key result
In simulated postcessation settings, the probability of Sabin 2 and 3 circulating for >9 months was 45% and 24% when OPV coverage was 10%, compared to <1% when coverage was 90%.
Absolute Event Rate: 45% vs 1%
In postcessation settings, the risk of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus emergence depends heavily on the scale of OPV reintroduction and between-household transmission rates, with low coverage outbreak responses posing high risks.
Low OPV coverage may prolong Sabin circulation postcessation; leaves open optimal reintroduction thresholds for eradication modeling.
Background: The Polio Eradication and Endgame Strategic Plan 2013-2018 calls for the gradual withdrawal of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) from routine immunization. We aimed to quantify the transmission potential of Sabin strains from OPV when it is reintroduced, accidentally or deliberately, in a community vaccinated with inactivated poliovirus vaccine alone. Methods: We built an individual-based stochastic epidemiological model that allows independent spread of 3 Sabin serotypes and differential transmission rates within versus between households. Model parameters were estimated by fitting to data from a prospective cohort in Mexico. We calculated the effective reproductive number for the Mexico cohort and simulated scenarios of Sabin strain resurgence under postcessation conditions, projecting the risk of prolonged circulation, which could lead to circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV). Results: The estimated effective reproductive number for naturally infected individuals was about 1 for Sabin 2 and Sabin 3 (OPV2 and OPV3) in a postcessation setting. Most transmission events occurred between households. We estimated the probability of circulation for >9 months to be (1) <<1% for all 3 serotypes when 90% of children <5 years of age were vaccinated in a hypothetical outbreak control campaign; (2) 45% and 24% for Sabin 2 and Sabin 3, respectively, when vaccine coverage dropped to 10%; (3) 37% and 8% for Sabin 2 and Sabin 3, respectively, when a single active shedder appeared in a community. Conclusions: Critical factors determining the risk of cVDPV emergence are the scale at which OPV is reintroduced and the between-household transmission rate for poliovirus, with intermediate values posing the greatest risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2018) studied Poliovirus transmission (n=466). Reintroduction of Oral Poliovirus Vaccine (OPV) vs. 90% vaccination coverage vs 10% coverage was evaluated on Probability of prolonged circulation (>9 months) of Sabin 2 strain. In simulated postcessation settings, the probability of Sabin 2 and 3 circulating for >9 months was 45% and 24% when OPV coverage was 10%, compared to <1% when coverage was 90%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: