Key result
Left femoral venous access for Micra TPS implantation was safe and effective compared to right-sided access, with similar procedural success and 0 major complications versus 4% in the right-sided group.
Why the study?
Micra leadless pacemakers are conventionally implanted via right femoral venous access, but a left-sided approach may be necessary, and its safety and efficacy compared with the right-sided approach required evaluation.
Does left femoral venous access provide similar safety and efficacy compared to right femoral venous access for leadless pacemaker implantation?
Observational (n=143)
No
Does left femoral venous access provide similar safety and efficacy compared to right femoral venous access for leadless pacemaker implantation?
Left femoral venous access for leadless pacemaker implantation is a safe and effective alternative to the conventional right-sided approach, and is frequently chosen following a previous transfemoral TAVI procedure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports left femoral access post-TAVI; extends observational data but remains hypothesis-generating pending RCTs.
AIMS: Leadless pacing has become an alternative approach for patients requiring a single-chamber pacemaker. Conventionally, leadless Micra Transcatheter Pacing System (TPS) pacemakers are implanted via a right femoral venous access. However, due to various reasons, a left-sided femoral venous approach may be necessary. We hypothesized that a left-sided femoral venous approach is as safe and effective when compared with a right-sided approach. We assessed indications, procedural characteristics, safety and mid-term outcomes of Micra TPS implantation via a left femoral venous approach when compared with the conventional right-sided approach. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective single-centre analysis, 143 consecutive patients undergoing Micra TPS implantation were included. 87% (125/143) underwent Micra TPS implantation via a right, and 13% (18/143) via a left femoral venous access. The mean age at implantation was 79.8 ± 7.5 years. Acute procedural success, mean procedure and fluoroscopy times as well as device parameters at implantation and follow-up (mean 15 ± 11.5 months) were similar between the two groups. Five major complications (3.5%) were encountered, all using a right-sided approach. After a transfemoral TAVI procedure, left femoral venous access was used in 42% of cases when compared with 8% in the remaining population (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: A left femoral venous access for Micra TPS implantation is safe and effective with an excellent implantation success rate similar to a conventional right femoral venous access without longer implantation and fluoroscopy times. The most frequent reason for choosing left vs. right femoral venous access was a previous transfemoral TAVI procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jelisejevas et al. (2021) conducted an observational in patients requiring a single-chamber pacemaker (n=143). Left femoral venous access vs. Right femoral venous access was evaluated on Major complications. Left femoral venous access for Micra TPS implantation was safe and effective compared to right-sided access, with similar procedural success and 0 major complications versus 4% in the right-sided group.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: