Key result
This paper is a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating the optimal timing of surgery for poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, and therefore contains no clinical results.
Why the study?
Does early or intermediate neurosurgical clipping improve functional outcomes in patients with poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage compared to late surgery?
RCT (n=99)
Observer-blinded
Minimization with stratified randomization
No
Does early or intermediate neurosurgical clipping improve functional outcomes in patients with poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage compared to late surgery?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to determine the optimal timing of surgical intervention for patients with poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
BACKGROUND: Subarachnoid hemorrhage is a common and dangerous disease with an unfavorable prognosis. Patients with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage (Hunt & Hess Grades 4-5) are unconscious on admission. Because of the high mortality and disability rate associated with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage, it is often treated conservatively. Timing of surgery for poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is still controversial, therefore this study aims to identify the optimal time to operate on patients admitted in poor clinical condition. METHODS/DESIGN: Ninety-nine patients meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned into three treatment groups. The early surgery group received operation within 3 days after onset of subarachnoid hemorrhage (day of SAH = day 1); the intermediate surgery group received operation from days 4 to 7, and surgery was performed on the late surgery group after day 7. Follow-up was performed 1, 3, and 6 months after aneurysm clipping. Primary indicators of outcome included the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Modified Rankin Scale, while secondary indicators of outcome were assessed using the Barthel Index and mortality. DISCUSSION: This is the first prospective, single-center, observer-blinded, randomized controlled trial to elucidate optimal timing for surgery in poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. The results of this study will be used to direct decisions of surgical intervention in poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage, thus improving clinical outcomes for patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR-TRC-12002917.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=99). Early surgery (within 3 days of onset) vs. Intermediate surgery (days 4-7) and late surgery (after day 7) was evaluated on Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale and Modified Rankin Scale at 6 months. This paper is a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating the optimal timing of surgery for poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, and therefore contains no clinical results.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: