Key result
Treatment on days 3 to 10 for poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage was associated with the highest risk of delayed cerebral ischemia and poor prognosis at 3 months.
Why the study?
Differences in clinical prognosis between different treatment timings in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients were not well defined.
Does early treatment within 2 days improve prognosis and reduce delayed cerebral ischemia in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients compared to later treatment?
Cohort (n=127)
Does early treatment within 2 days improve prognosis and reduce delayed cerebral ischemia in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients compared to later treatment?
Early intervention within 2 days for poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is associated with a lower risk of delayed cerebral ischemia and poor prognosis at 3 months compared to treatment on days 3 to 10.
Supports early intervention over intermediate timing in poor-grade aSAH; leaves open optimal strategy pending randomized trials.
AIMS: To assess differences in the clinical prognosis between different treatment timings in poor-grade (Hunt and Hess grade 4-5) aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. METHODS: The treated 127 poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients were divided into three groups: early treatment within 2 days, treatment on days 3 to 10, and treatment for more than 10 days after the hemorrhage. Odd ratios with a 95% confidence interval were calculated in logistic regression for different timing strategies regarding delayed cerebral ischemia and poor prognosis at 3 months. Subgroup analyses were conducted to determine whether the different timing strategies affect the prognosis. RESULTS: Patients who received the treatment on days 3 to 10 were prone to develop delayed cerebral ischemia and poor prognosis at 3 months. Postponing treatment in patients older than 55 years or diagnosed with an intraventricular hematoma on the initial computed tomography scan may lead to poor prognosis, with the early intervention group as a reference. CONCLUSIONS: Early intervention in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is suggested to be implemented. The treatment on 3 to 10 days harbored the highest risk of poor prognosis; patients might benefit more from early intervention, especially for ones older than 55 years or diagnosed with an intraventricular hematoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Poor-grade (Hunt and Hess grade 4-5) aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=127). Treatment on days 3 to 10 or >10 days vs. Early treatment within 2 days was evaluated on Delayed cerebral ischemia and poor prognosis at 3 months. Treatment on days 3 to 10 for poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage was associated with the highest risk of delayed cerebral ischemia and poor prognosis at 3 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: