Why the study?
Does enrasentan improve left ventricular remodeling compared to enalapril in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
Does enrasentan improve left ventricular remodeling compared to enalapril in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
Enrasentan at 60-90 mg/day over six months causes adverse ventricular remodeling and more serious adverse events compared to enalapril in asymptomatic patients with LV systolic dysfunction.
Enrasentan should be avoided for remodeling in asymptomatic LV dysfunction; challenges endothelin antagonism as therapeutic alternative to enalapril.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of the dual endothelin A/B receptor antagonist enrasentan with enalapril on left ventricular (LV) remodelling. METHODS: Multicentre, randomised, double blind, parallel group study of 72 asymptomatic patients with LV dysfunction. Patients received enrasentan (60-90 mg/day) or enalapril (10-20 mg/day). The primary end point was the change in LV end diastolic volume index (EDVI) after six months' treatment. RESULTS: LV EDVI increased with enrasentan but decreased with enalapril (3.9 (1.8) v -3.4 (1.4) ml/m2, p = 0.001). Enrasentan increased resting cardiac index compared with enalapril (0.11 (0.07) v -0.10 (0.07) l/m2, p = 0.04), as well as LV mass index (0.67 (1.6) v -3.6 (1.6) g/m2, p = 0.04). Other variables were comparable between groups. Enalapril lowered brain natriuretic peptide more than enrasentan (-19.3 (9.4) v -5.8 (6.9) pg/ml, p = 0.005). Noradrenaline (norepinephrine) (p = 0.02) increased more with enrasentan than with enalapril. Enrasentan was associated with more serious adverse events compared with enalapril (six (16.7%) patients v one (2.8%), p = 0.02); the rate of progression of heart failure did not differ. CONCLUSION: In asymptomatic patients with LV dysfunction, LV EDVI increased over six months with enrasentan compared with enalapril treatment, with adverse neurohormonal effects. This suggests that enrasentan at a dose of 60-90 mg/day over six months causes adverse ventricular remodelling despite an increase in the resting cardiac index.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S. K. Prasad (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: