Why the study?
Does a modular guided self-choice approach to secondary prevention improve coronary risk profile and knowledge in ACS patients who do not access standard cardiac rehabilitation?
Does a modular guided self-choice approach to secondary prevention improve coronary risk profile and knowledge in ACS patients who do not access standard cardiac rehabilitation?
This study protocol outlines an RCT to evaluate whether a modular, self-guided secondary prevention program improves risk factors and knowledge in ACS patients who do not participate in standard cardiac rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tests modular self-guided secondary prevention in ACS patients declining cardiac rehabilitation; leaves open its effects on risk factors and knowledge.
Redfern et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: