Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cardiac contractility modulation therapy in elderly patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Does cardiac contractility modulation therapy improve functional capacity and biomarkers in elderly patients with HFrEF?
Observational (n=16)
Open-label
Yes
Does cardiac contractility modulation therapy improve functional capacity and biomarkers in elderly patients with HFrEF?
Cardiac contractility modulation therapy significantly improves 6-minute walk test distance in elderly patients with HFrEF over 12 months.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support CCM use in elderly HFrEF; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Aim. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy in elderly patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods . Sixteen patients older than 65 years old (median age 70 years) undergoing CCM Optimizer (Impulse Dynamics) device implantation due to HFrEF (NYHA class II - 9 (56%), III - 4 (25%), IV - 3 (19%)) were enrolled in this two-center observational study. Before implantation 6-minute walk test (6MWT), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed on all patients, and NTproBNP levels were assessed. The follow-up duration was 12 months with 2, 6, 12-month follow-up visits. Control 6MWT, TTE and NTproBNP tests were performed at 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits. Results. Two patients died during follow-up due to HF decompensation. The remaining patients showed a significant improvement in 6MWT (350 m vs 402.5 m, p=0,01). We also noted a tendency towards the left ventricular EF improvement (33% vs 40%, p=0,2) and lower values of NTproBNP levels (1112 pg/ml vs 527 pg/ml, p=0,19). Conclusion. CCM therapy is a safe and efficient additional treatment option to manage elderly patients with HFrEF for reducing signs and symptoms of HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chugunov et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=16). Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy vs. Baseline (pre-implantation) was evaluated on 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance in meters (p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: