Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To compare the optical performance of 3 trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs): the Acrysof IQ Panoptix (+2.17 diopter [D]/+3.25 D IOL), AT LISA Tri 839MP (+1.66 D/+3.33 D IOL), and Finevision Micro F (+1.75 D/+3.50 D IOL). SETTING: Alcon Research Ltd., Fort Worth, Texas, USA. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: The 3 trifocal IOLs were compared using optical performance tests. To measure image quality, through-focus modulation transfer function (MTF) curves were generated for a model eye. To assess resolution, through-focus Badal images of an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart simulating viewing distances of infinity to 40 cm were recorded. To measure photic phenomena, simulated headlight images with a 50 μm pinhole target and a 5.0 mm pupil were obtained. RESULTS: The MTF measurements showed similar near and distance peaks for the IOLs, but the optimum intermediate peak for the +2.17 D/+3.25 D IOL was 60 cm versus 80 cm for the other 2 trifocal IOLs. Similarly, in bench Badal image testing, the optimum intermediate image was at 60 cm for the +2.17 D/+3.25 D IOL and 80 cm for the other 2 IOLs. Overall, halos surrounding simulated headlight images were equivalent for the 3 IOLs. CONCLUSIONS: In bench studies, the new +2.17 D/+3.25 D trifocal IOL showed equivalent or better performance in image quality, resolution, and photic phenomena compared with the +1.66 D/+3.33 D and +1.75 D/+3.50 D trifocal IOLs. The new IOL is expected to provide better intermediate vision at 60 cm, which is preferred for real-life tasks such as computer work, over the 80 cm intermediate distance offered by the other 2 trifocal IOLs. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: All authors are employees of Alcon Research, Ltd.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carson et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: