Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ex vivo study reveals that mesothelium accounts for 92% of albumin diffusion resistance in rabbit pericardium, indicating macromolecule transfer occurs via large pores or transcytosis.
Diffusional permeability (P) to inulin (P(in)), albumin (P(alb)), and dextrans [70 (P(dx 70)), 150 (P(dx 150)), 550 (P(dx 550)), and 2, 000 (P(dx 2,000))] was determined in specimens of parietal pericardium of rabbits, which may be obtained with less damage than pleura. P(in), P(alb), P(dx 70), P(dx 150), P(dx 550), and P(dx 2, 000) were 0.51 +/- 0.06 (SE), 0.18 +/- 0.03, 0.097 +/- 0.021, 0. 047 +/- 0.011, 0.025 +/- 0.004, and 0.021 +/- 0.005 x 10(-5) cm/s, respectively. P(in), P(alb), and P(dx 70) of connective tissue, obtained after removal of mesothelium from specimens, were 10.3 +/- 1.42, 2.97 +/- 0.38, and 2.31 +/- 0.16 x 10(-5) cm/s, respectively. Hence, P(in), P(alb), and P(dx 70) of mesothelium were 0.54, 0.20, and 0.10 x 10(-5) cm/s, respectively. Inulin (like small solutes) fitted the relationship P-solute radius for restricted diffusion with a 6-nm "pore" radius, whereas macromolecules were much above it. Hence, macromolecule transfer mainly occurs through "large pores" and/or transcytosis. In line with this, the addition of phospholipids on the luminal side (which decreases pore radius to approximately 1.5 nm) halved P(in) but did not change P(alb) and P(dx 70). P(in) is roughly similar in mesothelium and capillary endothelium, whereas P to macromolecules is greater in mesothelium. The albumin diffusion coefficient through connective tissue was 17% of that in water. Mesothelium provides 92% of resistance to albumin diffusion through the pericardium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bodega et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: