Why the study?
Does renal nerve stimulation-induced blood pressure change predict ambulatory blood pressure response after renal denervation in patients with drug-resistant hypertension?
Does renal nerve stimulation-induced blood pressure change predict ambulatory blood pressure response after renal denervation in patients with drug-resistant hypertension?
Renal nerve stimulation-induced blood pressure changes before and after renal denervation strongly correlate with long-term ambulatory blood pressure reductions, suggesting RNS could serve as an acute procedural endpoint.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RNS may predict ABPM response after RDN; hypothesis-generating from case report and requires prospective validation.
Blood pressure (BP) response to renal denervation (RDN) is highly variable and its effectiveness debated. A procedural end point for RDN may improve consistency of response. The objective of the current analysis was to look for the association between renal nerve stimulation (RNS)-induced BP increase before and after RDN and changes in ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) after RDN. Fourteen patients with drug-resistant hypertension referred for RDN were included. RNS was performed under general anesthesia at 4 sites in the right and left renal arteries, both before and immediately after RDN. RNS-induced BP changes were monitored and correlated to changes in ambulatory BP at a follow-up of 3 to 6 months after RDN. RNS resulted in a systolic BP increase of 50±27 mm Hg before RDN and systolic BP increase of 13±16 mm Hg after RDN (P<0.001). Average systolic ABPM was 153±11 mm Hg before RDN and decreased to 137±10 mm Hg at 3- to 6-month follow-up (P=0.003). Changes in RNS-induced BP increase before versus immediately after RDN and changes in ABPM before versus 3 to 6 months after RDN were correlated, both for systolic BP (R=0.77, P=0.001) and diastolic BP (R=0.79, P=0.001). RNS-induced maximum BP increase before RDN had a correlation of R=0.61 (P=0.020) for systolic and R=0.71 (P=0.004) for diastolic ABPM changes. RNS-induced BP changes before versus after RDN were correlated with changes in 24-hour ABPM 3 to 6 months after RDN. RNS should be tested as an acute end point to assess the efficacy of RDN and predict BP response to RDN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jong et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: