Why the study?
Does implantation of a second closure device improve complete closure in patients with moderate or large residual shunt after initial PFO closure?
Does implantation of a second closure device improve complete closure in patients with moderate or large residual shunt after initial PFO closure?
Transcatheter implantation of a second closure device for residual shunt after initial PFO closure is feasible and achieves complete closure in the majority of patients.
May be considered for select residual PFO shunts; leaves open need for controlled outcome trials.
AIMS: To summarise our experiences of device closure of residual shunt after transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO). METHODS AND RESULTS: Since October 1997 implantation of a second closure device was attempted in 40 patients with a moderate or large residual shunt after implantation of a PFO closure device. The mean age of the patients was 51 years. Implantation of a second closure device was technically successful in 39/40 patients (98 %). The following devices were implanted: Premere (n=20), Amplatzer PFO (n=13), STARFlex (n=4), Helex (n=1), Angelwings (n=1). During a mean follow-up of 36+/-29 months complete closure was achieved in 27 patients (69 %). The remaining shunt was small in nine patients, moderate in one and large in two. One patient with a moderate and one patient with a large residual shunt received a third device. The third patient was sent to surgery. One patient died 21 days after implantation of a third closure device due to acute pericardial tamponade. No other complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter implantation of a second closure device after PFO closure is feasible. Complete closure can be achieved in the majority of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Majunke et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: