Why the study?
Previous data regarding permanent pacemaker implantation frequency and indications in Fontan patients were limited and conflicting.
Does the type of Fontan surgery (extracardiac conduit vs lateral tunnel) affect the prevalence of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with univentricular heart defects?
Does the type of Fontan surgery (extracardiac conduit vs lateral tunnel) affect the prevalence of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with univentricular heart defects?
Extracardiac conduit Fontan surgery is associated with a significantly lower risk of requiring permanent pacemaker implantation compared to lateral tunnel.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change Fontan surgical practice; leaves open causal impact of conduit type on pacemaker implantation.
OBJECTIVE: Fontan surgery is performed in children with univentricular heart defects. Previous data regarding permanent pacemaker implantation frequency and indications in Fontan patients are limited and conflicting. We examined the prevalence of and risk factors for pacemaker treatment in a consecutive national cohort of patients after Fontan surgery in Sweden. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all Swedish patients who underwent Fontan surgery from 1982 to 2017 (n = 599). RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 12.2 years, 13% (78/599) of the patients with Fontan circulation had received pacemakers. Patients operated with the extracardiac conduit (EC) type of total cavopulmonary connection had a significantly lower prevalence of pacemaker implantation (6%) than patients with lateral tunnel (LT; 17%). Mortality did not differ between patients with (8%) and without pacemaker (5%). The most common pacemaker indication was sinus node dysfunction (SND) (64%). Pacemaker implantation due to SND was less common among patients with EC. Pacemaker implantation was significantly more common in patients with mitral atresia (MA; 44%), double outlet right ventricle (DORV; 24%) and double inlet left ventricle (DILV; 20%). In contrast, patients with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum and hypoplastic left heart syndrome were significantly less likely to receive a pacemaker (3% and 6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Thirteen percent of Fontan patients received a permanent pacemaker, most frequently due to SND. EC was associated with a significantly lower prevalence of pacemaker than LT. Permanent pacemaker was more common in patients with MA, DORV, and DILV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dahlqvist et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: