Why the study?
Little attention had been given to how clinical presentation, extent of venous thrombosis, and residual vein obstruction influence decisions regarding the duration of secondary prophylaxis after a first VTE.
What clinical factors influence the physician's decision to continue secondary prophylaxis after a first venous thromboembolism?
What clinical factors influence the physician's decision to continue secondary prophylaxis after a first venous thromboembolism?
Clinical presentation, such as proximal DVT or isolated PE, along with signs of post-thrombotic syndrome and residual vein obstruction, strongly influence physicians' decisions to extend secondary prophylaxis after a first VTE.
These factors shape real-world extension decisions after VTE; observational data leaves open optimal strategies pending RCTs.
BACKGROUND: Low attention has generally been dedicated to the influence of clinical presentation, extent of venous thrombosis and presence of residual vein obstruction (RVO) on the decision about the duration of secondary prophylaxis after a first venous thromboembolism (VTE). AIM: This study aimed at investigating the role of the mentioned VTE characteristics on the therapeutic decision using the information collected in the international, prospective, observational WHITE study. RESULTS: 1240 patients were recruited by 79 clinical centers in 7 countries (China, Czechia, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, and Tunisia). 35 patients had as index event a pulmonary embolism (PE) without a deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and all continued anticoagulation. We focused on the 1205 subjects with DVT. The treatment decision differed among countries; altogether, more than 85% of patients with proximal (with or without distal) DVT continued a prophylactic treatment with anticoagulants, or antithrombotics; 34% of patients with isolated distal DVT stopped treatment, and more than 85% of patients with a PE associated to a DVT continued treatment. At multivariable analysis, the presence of proximal DVT, signs of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), residual vein obstruction (RVO), maintenance <180 days and concomitant diseases was associated with increased probability to continue secondary prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: The presentation as proximal DVT (with or without PE) or isolated PE influenced the treating physicians' decision in favor of extension of secondary prophylaxis, together with the presence of concomitant diseases and local conditions which may increase the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palareti et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: