Why the study?
Do AGTR1 A(1166)C and NOS3 G(894)T gene polymorphisms increase the risk of stroke in middle-aged to older women?
Do AGTR1 A(1166)C and NOS3 G(894)T gene polymorphisms increase the risk of stroke in middle-aged to older women?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The AGTR1 CC genotype is associated with an increased risk of stroke in older women and those with elevated systolic blood pressure, suggesting a potential genetic marker for targeted risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: There is ample evidence that genetic factors contribute to cardiovascular disease risk. The present study aimed to assess the relation between polymorphisms of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AGTR1 A(1166)C) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3 G(894)T) and the risk of stroke. METHODS: We performed a case-cohort study on all first fatal and nonfatal stroke events (n = 74) and a 10% random sample (n = 1523) of a population-based cohort of women aged 49 to 70 years (n = 15,236; median follow-up 4.3 years). Univariate and multivariate unweigthed Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the relation between the polymorphisms, their interactions with coexisting risk factors, and the risk of stroke. RESULTS: The relation between the AGTR1 CC genotype and stroke risk (unadjusted hazards ratio [HR] 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-3.28) was modified by increasing age (>56 years: adjusted HR 2.77; 95% CI, 1.17-6.56) and systolic blood pressure (BP) (>130 mm Hg: adjusted HR 2.58; 95% CI, 1.12-5.93). The NOS3 G(894)T polymorphism, however, was not associated with stroke risk. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of other coexisting risk factors the AGTR1 A(1166)C but not the NOS3 G(894)T polymorphism increased the risk of stroke. The CC genotype may help identify those individuals who are at greatest risk and who may need (early) treatment or careful follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henskens et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: