Why the study?
The study was conducted to describe the in- and out-of-hospital flow, including diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up, of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Do dedicated HF cardiologists report higher implementation of guideline-recommended care for HFrEF patients compared to non-dedicated HF cardiologists?
Do dedicated HF cardiologists report higher implementation of guideline-recommended care for HFrEF patients compared to non-dedicated HF cardiologists?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A nationwide Belgian survey highlights that dedicated HF cardiologists are more likely to implement guideline-recommended care for HFrEF patients than non-dedicated cardiologists.
BACKGROUND: We conducted a nationwide survey to describe the in-and out-of-hospital flow (diagnosis, treatment and follow-up) of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHOD: A survey was developed with five dedicated HF cardiologists. The data are all self-reported by cardiologists. Most cardiologists indicated that target dosages of HF drugs can be reached in 25‒75% of patients. Achieving >75% of the target dose seems easier for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB) (22%) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (25%), compared to β-blockers (10%) and angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (7%). 62%, 49% and 4% of the cardiologists indicated to use subtypes of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and β-blockers respectively not validated in the HF population. In the acute setting, dedicated HF cardiologists (23%) are less influenced by blood parameters for decongestion compared to non-dedicated HF cardiologists (39%). They tend to change patients more to guideline-recommended drugs (60% vs 47%). Six minutes walk test and ergospirometry are significantly more used by dedicated compared to non-dedicated HF cardiologists for HF drug change (17% and 29% vs 2% and 4%). CONCLUSION: This survey showed that a minority of hospitals have HF care. Those that do, report a higher implementation of guideline-recommended diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of HF patients. Competent authorities could use this survey as a tool to improve HF care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghys et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: