Why the study?
Cancer patients with CAD and thrombocytopenia are often treated non-invasively due to perceived bleeding risk, prompting evaluation of TEG and platelet count to predict bleeding risk and mortality.
Can platelet count and thromboelastogram (TEG) predict bleeding risk and mortality to establish safe hemostatic thresholds for coronary angiography in cancer patients with thrombocytopenia?
Can platelet count and thromboelastogram (TEG) predict bleeding risk and mortality to establish safe hemostatic thresholds for coronary angiography in cancer patients with thrombocytopenia?
A platelet count threshold of 50,000/mm3 may be a safe cut-off for performing coronary angiography in cancer patients with thrombocytopenia.
May inform procedural thresholds in thrombocytopenic cancer patients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Objectives: To evaluate the role of platelet count and thromboelastogram (TEG) in the treatment of thrombocytopenic cancer patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Background: Cancer patients with CAD and thrombocytopenia are often treated non-invasively due to perceived high risk of bleeding. We sought to evaluate coagulability based on TEG and determine if platelet count and TEG could predict bleeding risk/mortality among cancer patients undergoing coronary angiography (CA). Methods: Baseline demographics, platelet count, and TEG parameters were recorded among cancer patients that underwent CA and had a concomitant TEG. Logistic regression and univariate proportional hazards regression analysis were performed to determine the impact of platelet count and coagulability on 24-month overall survival (OS). Results: All patients with platelet count 50,000/mm3 groups, as well as the improved survival, suggest that with appropriate clinical indication and risk/benefit assessment, a cut-off of 50,000/mm3 platelets can be considered for CA in cancer patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agha et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: