Why the study?
Simplified detection of atrial arrhythmias using consumer electronics could enable earlier therapy, but its feasibility and effectiveness in older populations were unknown.
Does a wristband with a photoplethysmography sensor detect atrial arrhythmias in adults ≥65 years without known atrial fibrillation?
Does a wristband with a photoplethysmography sensor detect atrial arrhythmias in adults ≥65 years without known atrial fibrillation?
Remote, digitally supported consumer-electronics-based screening using a PPG wristband is feasible and identifies atrial arrhythmias in 5% of older adults within 4 weeks.
May support remote PPG screening feasibility in older adults; leaves open whether detection alters outcomes or warrants routine adoption.
Aims: Simplified detection of atrial arrhythmias via consumer-electronics would enable earlier therapy in at-risk populations. Whether this is feasible and effective in older populations is not known. Methods and results: ase finding study (Smart in OAC-AFNET 9) digitally enrolled participants ≥65 years without known atrial fibrillation, not receiving oral anticoagulation in Germany, Poland, and Spain for 8 weeks. Participants were invited by media communications and direct contacts. Study procedures adhered to European data protection. Consenting participants received a wristband with a photoplethysmography sensor to be coupled to their smartphone. The primary outcome was the detection of atrial arrhythmias lasting 6 min or longer in the first 4 weeks of monitoring. Eight hundred and eighty-two older persons (age 71 ± 5 years, range 65-90, 500 (57%) women, 414 (47%) hypertension, and 97 (11%) diabetes) recorded signals. Most participants (72%) responded to adverts or word of mouth, leaflets (11%) or general practitioners (9%). Participation was completely remote in 469/882 persons (53%). During the first 4 weeks, participants transmitted PPG signals for 533/696 h (77% of the maximum possible time). Atrial arrhythmias were detected in 44 participants (5%) within 28 days, and in 53 (6%) within 8 weeks. Detection was highest in the first monitoring week [incidence rates: 1st week: 3.4% (95% confidence interval 2.4-4.9); 2nd-4th week: 0.55% (0.33-0.93)]. Conclusion: Remote, digitally supported consumer-electronics-based screening is feasible in older European adults and identifies atrial arrhythmias in 5% of participants within 4 weeks of monitoring (NCT04579159).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fabritz et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: