Why the study?
The study investigated the effects of crossover point exercise training versus high-intensity interval training on cardiovascular risk factors and vascular health in overweight young women.
Does crossover point (COP) exercise training improve cardiovascular risk factors and vascular health compared to high-intensity interval training in overweight young women?
Does crossover point (COP) exercise training improve cardiovascular risk factors and vascular health compared to high-intensity interval training in overweight young women?
Both 10 weeks of crossover point exercise and high-intensity interval training effectively improve cardiorespiratory fitness and vascular health in overweight young women.
Both COP and HIIT may improve VO2max and vascular markers in overweight young women; leaves open optimal regimen before practice change.
This study investigated the effects of 10 weeks of crossover point (COP) exercise training and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on cardiovascular risk factors and vascular health in overweight young women. Overweight young women were randomized into HIIT and COP groups. Participants in the HIIT group ( n = 10; age = 22 ± 2, body mass index (BMI) = 25.72 ± 0.90) and COP group ( n = 10, age = 21 ± 2, BMI = 25.90 ± 1.90) took part in 10 weeks of HIIT and COP exercise training, respectively. Cardiorespiratory fitness, cardiovascular health, and oxidative stress indicators were measured before and after the intervention period. After 10 weeks of exercise intervention, both COP exercise and HIIT led to a significant increase in maximal oxygen uptake ( p < 0.001). The systolic blood pressure ( p = 0.006), diastolic blood pressure ( p = 0.006), and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity ( p = 0.002) were significantly decreased in both COP group and HIIT group, while serum interleukin-6 levels were increased in HIIT and COP groups. The present study shows that a training program at COP could be an effective strategy to protect vascular health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: