Why the study?
The role of beta-blockers in decompensated heart failure and severe sepsis remains debated, and selecting appropriate inotropes for acute heart failure patients with low cardiac output on chronic beta-blockade is essential.
What is the appropriate choice of inotropic agent in acute heart failure patients requiring inotropes who are on chronic beta-blocker therapy?
What is the appropriate choice of inotropic agent in acute heart failure patients requiring inotropes who are on chronic beta-blocker therapy?
This review highlights the importance of maintaining or promptly reinstituting chronic beta-blocker therapy in acute heart failure and discusses the selection of appropriate inotropes for patients with low cardiac output.
Caution against beta-blocker withdrawal in AHF; leaves open optimal inotrope selection for low-output patients on chronic therapy.
The increasing rate of cardiovascular disorders contributes to rising hospitalized patients receive chronic oral beta-blocker therapy. Beta-blockers remain one of the fundamental therapy for chronic heart failure. Still, their role in decompensated heart failure and severe sepsis during hospitalization is often debated and inconsistent in clinical practice. In recent years, evidence of the efficacy and clinical outcomes of beta-blockers in acute heart failure (AHF) have accumulated. Clinical research indicates that chronic beta-blockade withdrawals should be prevented, or as soon as hemodynamic stabilization and euvolemic condition are reached, it should be reinstituted. As a subset of AHF patients with low cardiac output required inotropes, the choice of proper agent is fundamental. Different inotropic agents such as inhibitors of the phosphodiesterase, levosimendan, and dobutamine also their associations with beta-blockers are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Susanti et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: