Why the study?
Does amiodarone reduce the amount of appropriate ICD therapy and alteration of assigned treatment in Japanese patients with an ICD for sustained VT/VF?
Does amiodarone reduce the amount of appropriate ICD therapy and alteration of assigned treatment in Japanese patients with an ICD for sustained VT/VF?
The NIPPON trial is designed to evaluate whether adjuvant amiodarone therapy reduces appropriate ICD therapies and treatment alterations in Japanese patients with a history of sustained VT/VF.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Will determine if adjuvant amiodarone reduces ICD therapies in Japanese VT/VF patients; delivers RCT data to guide adjunctive antiarrhythmic use.
BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are the most effective therapy in reducing the mortality of patients with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, the ICD cannot prevent the recurrence of tachycarida attacks and that limits the clinical usefulness of them. The Nippon ICD Plus Pharmachologic Option Necessity (NIPPON) trial was designed as the first prospective randomized study to test the hypothesis whether amiodarone could improve the patient's clinical outcome by reducing the amount of ICD therapy in the Japanese patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Approximately 400 patients with organic heart disease and spontaneous episode(s) of sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) will be randomly assigned to one of 2 groups; the amiodarone group and non-amiodarone group. Both groups of patients will be followed at least for 24 months. The end-point committee will adjudicate events in a blinded fashion. The primary end-points of this study are determination of the appropriate therapy from the ICD and alteration of the assigned treatment because of its harmful effects and/or frequent ICD therapies. CONCLUSION: The NIPPON study is expected to confirm our understanding of the prognostic and therapeutic usefulness of adjuvant amiodarone therapy for patients with an ICD and with a history of sustained VT/VF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurita et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: