Why the study?
Does HMR-1826 reduce cardiotoxicity compared to doxorubicin in an isolated perfused rat heart model?
Does HMR-1826 reduce cardiotoxicity compared to doxorubicin in an isolated perfused rat heart model?
HMR-1826, a novel doxorubicin prodrug, is approximately 100-fold less cardiotoxic than standard doxorubicin in a preclinical model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
HMR-1826 may reduce doxorubicin cardiotoxicity; hypothesis-generating in animal models only and should not yet change practice.
Cardiotoxicity represents the major side-effect limiting the clinical use of anthracyclines, especially doxorubicin, in cancer chemotherapy. The use of non-toxic prodrugs, or of liposome-encapsulated drugs, allows a better targeting of the tumours and may, therefore, improve the tolerance to the treatment. Using the model of isolated perfused rat heart, we have evaluated the cardiotoxicity of a novel prodrug of doxorubicin, HMR-1826, which consists of the association of doxorubicin to glucuronic acid. We have compared the cardiac effects (developed pressure, contractility and relaxation of the left ventricle) induced by HMR-1826 to those induced by doxorubicin and Doxil, a liposomal form of doxorubicin. HMR-1826 was administered intravenously every other day for 11 days at doses of 50-200 mg kg(-1) per injection while doxorubicin was administered according to the same protocol at doses of 1-3 mg kg(-1) per injection. Doxorubicin strongly decreased the cardiac functional parameters at the doses of 2.5 and 3 mg kg(-1) per injection. Doxil (3 mg kg(-1) and HMR-1826 (50-150 mg kg(-1)) were largely devoid of cardiotoxicity. HMR-1826 only induced significant alterations of the cardiac function at the highest dose used (200 mg kg(-1) per injection). These alterations were much lower than those of doxorubicin at 2.5 mg kg(-1) per injection, despite similar general toxicity symptoms (weight loss, nose bleeding and diarrhoea) at these respective doses. Thus, HMR-1826 appeared about 100-fold less cardiotoxic than doxorubicin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Platel et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: