Why the study?
Do low molecular weight heparins prevent postoperative thromboembolism in patients undergoing orthopaedic, general, or gynaecological surgery compared to placebo, dextran, or unfractionated heparin?
Do low molecular weight heparins prevent postoperative thromboembolism in patients undergoing orthopaedic, general, or gynaecological surgery compared to placebo, dextran, or unfractionated heparin?
Low molecular weight heparins provide safe and efficient once-daily prophylaxis against postoperative thromboembolism in surgical patients.
LMWH reduces non-fatal PE in orthopaedic surgery; confirms superiority to placebo and equivalence to unfractionated heparin.
To evaluate the thromboprophylactic use of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), publications from 27 orthopaedic trials and 35 studies of patients undergoing general or gynaecological surgery were scrutinized and subjected to a partial meta-analysis. In orthopaedic surgery, LMWHs were superior to placebo or dextran and at least as efficient as unfractionated heparin in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Compared with unfractionated heparin, one of the LMWH preparations significantly reduced the total incidence of DVT. The rate of non-fatal pulmonary embolism was 0.49 per cent in patients receiving LMWH and 1.22 per cent in controls. Seven orthopaedic patients (0.15 per cent) died from pulmonary embolism, none of whom received LMWH. In general surgery, the LMWHs were at least as efficient as unfractionated heparin, with a trend towards a lower risk of pulmonary embolism with the former. Compared with unfractionated heparin, LMWHs did not reduce the postoperative mortality rate, nor did they cause haemorrhage. LMWHs provide safe and efficient prophylaxis by administration once daily.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jørgensen et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: