Why the study?
Does 2D speckle tracking-derived E/LS better estimate left ventricular relaxation and filling pressure compared to TDI-derived parameters in patients with cardiac diseases?
Does 2D speckle tracking-derived E/LS better estimate left ventricular relaxation and filling pressure compared to TDI-derived parameters in patients with cardiac diseases?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
E/LS derived from 2D speckle tracking strain provides a more accurate non-invasive estimation of left ventricular filling pressure than conventional TDI parameters.
In this of the Journal, Hayashi et al 11 report on their prospective multicenter study conducted in 5 institutions in Japan to compare correlation of TDI-and 2D speckle tracking-derived parameters with the time constant of LV pressure decay () and LV mean diastolic (LVMDP) in 77 patients with various cardiac diseases. The main findings of this study were that the correlation of e' with was weak, and that of peak longitudinal strain (LS) was the strongest among the 2D speckle tracking-derived parameters. In addition, the ratio of E to peak global LS (E/LS) correlated well with invasively measured LVMDP, which is significantly better than E/A or E/e'. The receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that E/LS had the largest area under the curve for distinguishing elevated LVMDP compared with E/e' and E/A.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hidekazu Tanaka (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: