Why the study?
Acute myocarditis in children carries high morbidity and mortality, with limited data regarding intravenous immunoglobulin treatment and outcomes.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Population
120 children with clinical diagnosis of acute myocarditis
Comparison
IVIG treated vs non-IVIG treated
Design
Single-center retrospective study
Acute myocarditis in children is associated with high morbidity and mortality, with limited data on intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment and outcome. Our goal was to describe clinical, treatment profile, and predictors of outcome in children with acute fulminant myocarditis (AFM) receiving intensive care. Case records of 120 children with clinical diagnosis of acute myocarditis from January 2008 to December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. AFM was seen in 89 (74.2%) children of which nearly two-thirds (54 [60.7%]) were hypotensive at admission. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) ejection fraction on echocardiography was 25 (18.5–36%). Eighty-two children (68.3%) received IVIG. Intensive care needs were mechanical ventilation (n = 71; 59.2%) and inotrope support (n = 89; 74.2%); median inotrope score being 30 (IQR: 20–55). Twenty-one children died (17.5%). Fever (p = 0.004), arrhythmia (p = 0.03), shock (p = 0.015), higher inotrope score (p = 0.0001), need for ventilation (p = 0.025), acidosis (p = 0.013), AKI (p = 0.0001), transaminitis (p = 0.0001), and multiorgan dysfunction (p = 0.0001) were associated with mortality. The mortality was significantly less in IVIG treated group (12.1 vs. 28.9%; p = 0.02). On multiple logistic regression, MODS (p = 0.002) was independent predictor of mortality while IVIG treatment (p = 0.004) was favorably associated with survival. AFM complicated by multiorgan dysfunction carried a poor prognosis. IVIG was associated with survival benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jayashree et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: