Why the study?
Are novel non-invasive oscillometric arterial stiffness parameters associated with established structural and functional local stiffness parameters in adults aged 50-81 years?
Are novel non-invasive oscillometric arterial stiffness parameters associated with established structural and functional local stiffness parameters in adults aged 50-81 years?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Novel non-invasive oscillometric arterial stiffness parameters are differentially associated with established structural and functional local stiffness parameters, supporting their potential utility as cardiovascular risk markers.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is a lack of evidence concerning associations between novel parameters of arterial stiffness as cardiovascular risk markers and traditional structural and functional vascular biomarkers in a population-based Caucasian cohort. We examined these associations in the second follow-up of the Swiss Cohort Study on Air Pollution and Lung and Heart Diseases in Adults (SAPALDIA 3). METHODS: Arterial stiffness was measured oscillometrically by pulse wave analysis to derive the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), brachial-ankle (baPWV) and aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV), and amplitude of the forward and backward wave. Carotid ultrasonography was used to measure carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and carotid lumen diameter (LD), and to derive a distensibility coefficient (DC). We used multivariable linear regression models adjusted for several potential confounders for 2,733 people aged 50-81 years. RESULTS: CAVI, aPWV and the amplitude of the forward and backward wave were significant predictors of cIMT (p < 0.001). All parameters were significantly associated with LD (p < 0.001), with aPWV and the amplitude of the forward wave explaining the highest proportion of variance (2%). Only CAVI and baPWV were significant predictors of DC (p < 0.001), explaining more than 0.3% of the DC variance. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that novel non-invasive oscillometric arterial stiffness parameters are differentially associated with specific established structural and functional local stiffness parameters. Longitudinal studies are needed to follow-up on these cross-sectional findings and to evaluate their relevance for clinical phenotypes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Endes et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: