The RVLM plays an equally important role in the sympathoinhibitory action of rilmenidine in both conscious and anesthetized rabbits, though the effect on arterial pressure is blunted in conscious animals likely due to lower baseline sympathetic drive.
Anesthesia exaggerates rilmenidine hypotension but not sympathoinhibition in rabbit RVLM; leaves open conscious-model relevance and human translation.
The pressor region of the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) is a critical site in the sympathoinhibitory action of imidazoline receptor agonists as shown by studies in anesthetized animals. The aim of this study was to compare the importance of the RVLM in mediating the inhibitory action of rilmenidine on renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) and arterial pressure in urethane-anesthetized rabbits (n = 11) and in conscious, chronically instrumented rabbits (n = 6). Bilateral microinjection of rilmenidine (4 nmol in 100 nl) into the RVLM caused a greater decrease in resting arterial pressure in anesthetized animals (-19 mm Hg) than in conscious animals (-8 mm Hg). By contrast, the decrease in resting RSNA evoked by rilmenidine was similar in conscious (-27%) and anesthetized (-36%) rabbits. Furthermore, rilmenidine microinjection into the RVLM was equally effective in inhibiting the RSNA baroreflex in both groups of animals. The upper plateau of the RSNA baroreflex decreased by 37% and 42%, and gain decreased by 41% and 44% after rilmenidine treatments in conscious and anesthetized rabbits, respectively. We conclude that the RVLM plays an equally important role in the inhibitory action of rilmenidine on RSNA in conscious and anesthetized rabbits either at rest or during baroreflex responses. A relatively moderate effect of rilmenidine on arterial pressure in conscious, chronically instrumented rabbits may relate to a lower level of sympathetic drive compared with anesthetized animals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mayorov et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: