Why the study?
Does genetic deletion or pharmacological antagonism of the AT1a receptor prevent pregnancy-associated hypertension and intrauterine growth retardation in a transgenic mouse model?
Does genetic deletion or pharmacological antagonism of the AT1a receptor prevent pregnancy-associated hypertension and intrauterine growth retardation in a transgenic mouse model?
The AT1a receptor plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of pregnancy-associated hypertension and intrauterine growth retardation in this transgenic mouse model.
Does not support AT1 antagonism in human pregnancy hypertension; leaves open its mechanistic role in transgenic models.
Little is known about an in vivo significance of angiotensin II Type-1 receptor (AT1) for pregnancy-associated diseases, including hypertension and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR). We previously demonstrated that female mice carrying the human angiotensinogen gene (hAG+/+), when mated with human renin transgenic (hRN+/+) male mice, displayed hypertension in late pregnancy due to secretion of human renin from the fetal side into the maternal circulation. In the present study, to investigate a role for AT1 in pregnancy-associated hypertension, we generated a new strain of hAG+/+/mAT1a-/- mice by genetically deleting the AT1a gene from hAG+/+ mice. When mated with hRN+/+ male mice, excessive increases in human renin, angiotensin, and plasma renin activity were detected in the plasma of pregnant hAG+/+/mAT1a-/- mice as found in that of pregnant hAG+/+ mice. Surprisingly, however, blood pressure of hAG+/+/mAT1a-/- mice was not elevated in late pregnancy despite the presence of AT1b, a subtype of AT1. The maternal and fetal defects, such as cardiac and placental abnormalities, and IUGR observed in pregnant hypertensive hAG+/+ mice were not recognized in pregnant hAG+/+/mAT1a-/- mice. The limited term administration of AT1 antagonists to hypertensive hAG+/+ mice in late pregnancy dramatically improved hypertension and IUGR, showing the clinical importance of AT1a.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saito et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: