Why the study?
Does a single oral dose of captopril lower blood pressure differently based on baseline urinary kallikrein excretion in essential hypertensives with normal or low plasma renin activity?
Does a single oral dose of captopril lower blood pressure differently based on baseline urinary kallikrein excretion in essential hypertensives with normal or low plasma renin activity?
The antihypertensive effect of captopril in normal- or low-renin essential hypertension depends on baseline kallikrein activity, suggesting the kallikrein-kinin system plays a role in ACE inhibitor efficacy.
Kallikrein excretion may identify captopril responders in low-renin hypertension; hypothesis-generating for kinin system role in ACE inhibitor efficacy.
The antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may result from the blockade of angiotensin II formation but also, theoretically, from the inhibition of kinin breakdown. To test whether a blunted activity of the kallikrein-kinin system might account for the failure of ACE inhibitors in lowering blood pressure (BP) in patients in whom the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is not enhanced, 31 essential hypertensives with normal or low plasma renin activity (PRA) were evaluated before and after a single oral dose (50 mg) of captopril. A significant fall, in both systolic and diastolic BP, was obtained in the subgroup of patients who were classified as 'normal-kallikrein hypertensives' according to whether their pretreatment urinary kallikrein excretion was within the normal range, while no significant change in BP was observed in 'low-kallikrein hypertensives'. Furthermore, the mean percentage fall in mean BP, throughout the 2 h following captopril administration, was significantly related to the basal value of urinary kallikrein excretion (r = 0.47, P less than 0.05) in all the patients. Our results suggest that blunted activity of the kallikrein system might be responsible for failure of captopril to lower BP in some hypertensive patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madeddu et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: