Why the study?
Does AT1 receptor blockade with L-158,809 attenuate stop-flow pressure tubuloglomerular feedback responses in hypertensive ren-2 transgenic rats?
Does AT1 receptor blockade with L-158,809 attenuate stop-flow pressure tubuloglomerular feedback responses in hypertensive ren-2 transgenic rats?
AT1 receptor blockade significantly attenuates tubuloglomerular feedback responsiveness in hypertensive ren-2 transgenic rats, indicating a strong stimulatory effect of ANG II on this mechanism.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AT1 blockade attenuates TGF in ren-2 rats; leaves open translation to human hypertensive kidney disease.
The present study was performed to determine the angiotensin II (ANG II) dependence of stop-flow pressure (SFP) tubuloglomerular feedback responses in hypertensive transgenic rats [strain name: TGR(mRen2)27] harboring the mouse ren-2 renin gene. SFP feedback responses to increases in late proximal perfusion rate were assessed in pentobarbital-anesthetized male ren-2 transgenic rats during control conditions and after administration of the AT1 receptor antagonist, L-158,809 (1 mg/kg iv). During control conditions, increases in late proximal perfusion rate elicited flow-dependent decreases in SFP. The magnitude of the maximal SFP feedback response to a late proximal perfusion rate of 40 nl/min averaged 16.1 +/- 1.4 mmHg (n = 7), a value higher than that normally observed in normotensive rats. Administration of L-158,809 decreased mean arterial blood pressure (174 +/- 6 vs. 117 +/- mmHg, P < 0.01, n = 10) and attenuated the magnitude of the maximal SFP feedback response by 84 +/- 4% (16.1 +/- 1.4 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.5 mmHg, P < 0.01, n = 7). In contrast, mechanical reduction of renal arterial pressure from 179 +/- 5 to 113 +/- 1 mmHg (P < 0.01, n = 7) attenuated the magnitude of the maximal SFP feedback response by only 43 +/- 5% (14.4 +/- 1.9 vs. 7.9 +/- 0.7 mmHg, P < 0.01, n = 7), indicating that approximately one-half of the attenuation of SFP feed-back responses elicited by AT1 receptor blockade was due to removal of the stimulatory effect of ANG II on the sensitivity of the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitchell et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: