Why the study?
Does automated carbon dioxide rebreathing accurately measure cardiac output compared to dye dilution and thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization?
Does automated carbon dioxide rebreathing accurately measure cardiac output compared to dye dilution and thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization?
Automated carbon dioxide rebreathing is an accurate non-invasive method for measuring resting cardiac output compared to dye dilution, though its variability necessitates multiple measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
May support automated CO2 rebreathing as non-invasive cardiac output measure; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Russell et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: